Delta Virtual Airlines Water Cooler | PC Support |
Is there no pc that runs FSX perfectly |
DVA8060
First Officer, B737-800
Joined on December 06 2009
B757 100 Club
Online Double Century Club
Everett 250 Club
Triple Century Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Swindon, UK
347 legs, 998.9 hours
280 legs,
861.5 hours online 343 legs,
986.8 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
February 01 2013 06:36 ET by Jamie Moss
|
So my new system finally arrived and I,ve got round to installing FSX, at this point with no add ons, I'm finding in the VC mode the FPS is not what I thought it would-be for a pc of this size
I7-3770 3.5ghz oc @ 4.5
NVIDIA 670 2gb geforce graphics
8 gb ram
2 huge hard drive
Anyone else with similar system, what tweaks do u have to apply to get VC FPS to a level of around 30 regardless of scenery/add on aircraft, do add ons have a more positive effect than defaults, such as UT/GEX programs.
I thought this system would be fine straight out of the box, if the worse comes to the worst then I may just return to FS9 but that would then defeat the point of buying a pc for FSX
Any assistance would-be great, it would appear that the transition to FSX is a tricky one
Jamie MossFirst Officer, B737-800
|
|
DVA11180
Captain, A320
Joined on December 12 2012
Century Club
Minneapolis, MN
143 legs, 266.3 hours
133 legs,
249.7 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
February 01 2013 08:26 ET by Caleb Williams
|
Don't have the direct link, but the AvSim forum contains a comprehensive tweaking guide for FSX. I would check that out. Also there's a program whose name i cannot remember that will tweak FSX as well.
Caleb WilliamsCaptain, A320
|
|
DVA10705
First Officer, B747-400
OLP
Joined on April 27 2012
Two Million Mile Club
Everett 500 Club
Millennium Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Kamloops, BC Canada
1,060 legs, 5,399.0 hours
87 legs,
356.0 hours online 1,059 legs,
5,397.6 hours ACARS 15 legs,
48.6 hours event 3,528 legs, 15,773.5 hours total 15 legs dispatched, 24.4
hours
|
Posted onPost created on
February 01 2013 09:12 ET by Bill Gardiner
|
Here is a link to the Avsim guide. Some of these tweaks give you marginal improvement but some of them are a must have. And you should do the whole thing, read through the whole guide because some of them interact with each other.
http://forum.avsim.net/topic/398025-avsim-software-and-hardware-guide-for-fsx/
Bill GardinerFirst Officer, B747-400
|
|
DVA11180
Captain, A320
Joined on December 12 2012
Century Club
Minneapolis, MN
143 legs, 266.3 hours
133 legs,
249.7 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
February 01 2013 10:12 ET by Caleb Williams
|
Bill, which tweaks would you say cause the biggest differences?
Caleb WilliamsCaptain, A320
|
|
DVA1583
Senior Captain, MD-11
OLP
Joined on March 23 2004
Everett 250 Club
Online Six Century Club
50 State Club
DVA Fifteen-Year Anniversary
Seven Century Club
South America
710 legs, 1,938.2 hours
619 legs,
1,760.2 hours online 589 legs,
1,630.3 hours ACARS 16 legs,
61.2 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
February 01 2013 10:14 ET by Charly Azcue
|
I recently build a similar system
i7 3770K - 16Gb DDR3 - GTX680 2Gb
I follow Kosta´s guide and have very fluid sim with PMDG NGX even at stock i7 3.9Ghz, no overclocking.
http://kostasfsworld.wordpress.com/fsx-software-and-hardware-guide/
Regards

|
DVA5270
Senior Captain, B737-800
Joined on September 27 2007
50 State Club
Everett 500 Club
Online Quintuple Century Club
Nine Century Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
"p=np" Charleston, SC USA
977 legs, 1,725.8 hours
578 legs,
894.1 hours online 931 legs,
1,647.1 hours ACARS 43 legs,
67.0 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
February 01 2013 10:18 ET by Don Thomas
|
I guess the key word is "perfectly".
My system is; Intel Core i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30 GHz over clocked to 4.00 with 4 gb ram. Nvidia 8800GTX ( yes its old).
Graphics, FPS to unlimited, trilinear, anti aliasing on. Global texture very high.
Aircraft, set to Medium high
Scenery, raduis large, mesh 94, Mesh Res 1m, texture res 30cm, water effects 1.x, scenery complexity extream dense, auto gen very dense, special effects high
Weather, very low
Traffic, I use MyTraffic X Professional Version 5.4b set at 50% factorey set to custom then airline density slid to 50%
with FSX I got
44.5 frames per second http://www.deltava.org/pirep.do?id=0xd649e
26.5 frames per second http://www.deltava.org/thread.do?id=0x1baa8
40.1 frames per second http://www.deltava.org/pirep.do?id=0xd4d6d
fs9 gives me
189.6 frames per second http://www.deltava.org/thread.do?id=0x1baa8
I am very happy.
fs9 for online flights and fsx with radar contact for off line flights.
for ME that is as perfect as I need it.
Don ThomasSenior Captain, B737-800
|
|
DVA11221
Captain, B777-200
OLP
Joined on January 01 2013
50 State Club
Century Club
Issaquah, WA
114 legs, 423.9 hours
37 legs,
94.4 hours online 114 legs,
423.9 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
February 01 2013 10:59 ET by Shaun Oneil
|
I saw the best performance enhancements after I utilized the following:
http://www.venetubo.com/fsx.html ... automated tool to tweak your fsx.cfg
http://aussiex.org/forum/index.php?/files/file/1598-fps-limiter-02/ ... external fps limiter
http://forum.avsim.net/topic/324786-nvidia-configuration-guide-inspector-2xxxx-drivers-version-20-explanations-of-all-settings/ ... forum post for how to setup nvidia inspector tool to appropriately adjust GPU settings for FSX
Shaun OneilCaptain, B777-200
|
|
DVA10705
First Officer, B747-400
OLP
Joined on April 27 2012
Two Million Mile Club
Everett 500 Club
Millennium Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Kamloops, BC Canada
1,060 legs, 5,399.0 hours
87 legs,
356.0 hours online 1,059 legs,
5,397.6 hours ACARS 15 legs,
48.6 hours event 3,528 legs, 15,773.5 hours total 15 legs dispatched, 24.4
hours
|
Posted onPost created on
February 01 2013 14:40 ET by Bill Gardiner
|
Calem, I would rename your fsx.cfg to something else, then restart fsx. There will be a new one built for you with default settings. Make the settings in fsx that you want, like autogen and weather and looking at the guide, then exit fsx and edit the new fsx.cfg file with the recommendations from the guide. Then you'll have a completely fresh fsx.cfg with all the settings from the guide but can get back to where you were before if you want.
Bill GardinerFirst Officer, B747-400
|
|
DVA10698
Chief Pilot, B717-200
OLP, 737-ATP DISPATCHER
Joined on April 25 2012
50 State Club
Globetrotter
US Mountaineer Club
US Coastal Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Everett Millennium Club
Events Century Club
Flying Colonel
Online Fifteen Century
"Life is simple, eat, sleep, fly, sim....." Miami, FL
1,683 legs, 2,310.0 hours
1,622 legs,
2,205.0 hours online 1,683 legs,
2,310.0 hours ACARS 104 legs,
165.6 hours event 75 legs dispatched, 191.3
hours
|
Posted onPost created on
February 01 2013 15:51 ET by Jay Marin
|
Since you have an NVIDIA video card, this might help as well. I did follow through and it helped on mine system. Good luck!
http://forum.avsim.net/topic/324786-nvidia-configuration-guide-inspector-2xxxx-drivers-version-20-explanations-of-all-settings/

|
DVA8158
Captain, B767-300
OLP
Joined on December 31 2009
Century Club
Online Century Club
50 State Club
"Eight hours bottle to throttle." Newnan, GA USA
197 legs, 437.5 hours
161 legs,
329.8 hours online 196 legs,
435.9 hours ACARS 5 legs,
17.1 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
February 03 2013 12:33 ET by Peter Bagrationoff
|
Jamie Moss wrote:
So my new system finally arrived and I,ve got round to installing FSX, at this point with no add ons, I'm finding in the VC mode the FPS is not what I thought it would-be for a pc of this size
I7-3770 3.5ghz oc @ 4.5
NVIDIA 670 2gb geforce graphics
8 gb ram
2 huge hard drive
Anyone else with similar system, what tweaks do u have to apply to get VC FPS to a level of around 30 regardless of scenery/add on aircraft, do add ons have a more positive effect than defaults, such as UT/GEX programs.
I thought this system would be fine straight out of the box, if the worse comes to the worst then I may just return to FS9 but that would then defeat the point of buying a pc for FSX
Any assistance would-be great, it would appear that the transition to FSX is a tricky one
I have similar specs and all I can tell you is you will have to spend some time tweaking it. I have my sliders at 75% and get 30 FPS in the PMDG NGX with default scenery and using AS2012 textures with Opus FSX weather. I used Bjote's tweaking tool already mentioned http://www.venetubo.com/fsx.html and some other changes found on the Avsim forums. It probably took me about 8 hours of reading, tweaking, testing, etc before I came up with the right combination for me. Also experiment with the Inspector Settings until you get the best visuals and performance ratio. Its really a matter of personal preference.

|
DVA8060
First Officer, B737-800
Joined on December 06 2009
B757 100 Club
Online Double Century Club
Everett 250 Club
Triple Century Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Swindon, UK
347 legs, 998.9 hours
280 legs,
861.5 hours online 343 legs,
986.8 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
February 03 2013 16:53 ET by Jamie Moss
|
Guys thank you so much, tried that tweaking software and suddenly things changed almost immediatly, if I turn off the autogen I am getting 100 FPS even at EHAM, which was unheard of for me in FS9!, the true test will obviously come as I start to add stuff particularly the pmdg 747, but you all have given me so much pleasure with your tips, just as I was considering continuing with FS9
Jamie MossFirst Officer, B737-800
|
|
DVA8060
First Officer, B737-800
Joined on December 06 2009
B757 100 Club
Online Double Century Club
Everett 250 Club
Triple Century Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Swindon, UK
347 legs, 998.9 hours
280 legs,
861.5 hours online 343 legs,
986.8 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
February 05 2013 04:40 ET by Jamie Moss
|
Peter are those specs not very strong then?, maybe I was naive in thinking that would be strong enough to run FSX the way I want it, mega airport Amsterdam dropped the FPS below 20 and to me that is not good enough, fortunatly the same airfield in FS9 was able to achieve twice as much so I think I will return to that, the question I can't figure out is why FSX was made in such a way that u need a super pc to be able to run it
Jamie MossFirst Officer, B737-800
|
|
DVA5270
Senior Captain, B737-800
Joined on September 27 2007
50 State Club
Everett 500 Club
Online Quintuple Century Club
Nine Century Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
"p=np" Charleston, SC USA
977 legs, 1,725.8 hours
578 legs,
894.1 hours online 931 legs,
1,647.1 hours ACARS 43 legs,
67.0 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
February 06 2013 19:05 ET by Don Thomas
|
"Why is FSX was made in such a way that u need a super pc to be able to run it ?"
It was built for future tech to catch up, as pc's speed up they would catch up to FSX. It was also the last flight sim they were putting out.
They could re write it in something other than the current language but found it to be cost prohibitive. They did not sell more FSX programs than FS9, so they assumed that only replacment copies were being purchased, or for evey one getting into simming one was getting out. The market share did not expand.
They, MS aso found out that there was no way to profit from the countless add ons being developed. They tried in "Flight" ( which flopped ).
This is based on a conversation I had with a MS development person vacationing where I work.
My $0.02
Don ThomasSenior Captain, B737-800
|
|
DVA10705
First Officer, B747-400
OLP
Joined on April 27 2012
Two Million Mile Club
Everett 500 Club
Millennium Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Kamloops, BC Canada
1,060 legs, 5,399.0 hours
87 legs,
356.0 hours online 1,059 legs,
5,397.6 hours ACARS 15 legs,
48.6 hours event 3,528 legs, 15,773.5 hours total 15 legs dispatched, 24.4
hours
|
Posted onPost created on
February 06 2013 19:34 ET by Bill Gardiner
|
"Why is FSX was made in such a way that u need a super pc to be able to run it ?"
It is a product of its time and so has some serious architectural issues. It is not 64 bit so the CPU can't take advantage of advanced memory management and more and faster RAM, it was written for one core so can't take advantage of multiple core CPU's, and is CPU dependent so doesn't take advantage of today's graphics cards. So even a super PC is going to struggle because the code can't take full advantage. And it's nobody's fault, that's just the way it was done then. The fact that FSX is still going and has such a strong community keeping it going is pretty cool.
Bill GardinerFirst Officer, B747-400
|
|
DVA8060
First Officer, B737-800
Joined on December 06 2009
B757 100 Club
Online Double Century Club
Everett 250 Club
Triple Century Club
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Swindon, UK
347 legs, 998.9 hours
280 legs,
861.5 hours online 343 legs,
986.8 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
February 08 2013 17:35 ET by Jamie Moss
|
Bill/Don
some interesting views there for sure, the way I like to have flight simulator running is pointing me towards keeping with fs9, it is a shame but as you say thats the way it has been done, I can get more out of fs9 than fsx, there is still a quality 747 for fs9 and it should run well on this pc, plus most of the airports KLM serves with the 74 are available for it still
Thanks for those points it proves that it would be difficult to get a perfect running fsx regardless
Jamie MossFirst Officer, B737-800
|
|